Monday, April 28, 2008

Tempelhof is dead, long live Tempelhof!

It was democracy in action again yesterday in Berlin, and it all went terribly wrong. Well, in my view it did. We all know that a government is only as good as the people who elect it (or vote it out of office), but if anybody ever had any doubts about referendums, well, here we have it. The same holds true for them, too.



Let’s do the numbers: Although opinion polls before the vote indicated that 60 percent of Berlin’s population was in favor of keeping Tempelhof open, only a mere 21 percent of those eligible even took the trouble to vote. Unfortunately, a 25 percent turnout was the minimum needed for the referendum to pass, the first such referendum in Berlin’s history, by the way.

But hey, it’s not the end of the world. It’s just the end of a century-old chapter of heroic aviation history and the “Mother of all airports” (Sir Norman Foster). And who knows? Maybe something good will come out of this, other than all the cool new graffiti we’ll be able to enjoy on Tempelhof's walls starting this October, I mean.

New ideas are being sought for what to do with the monstrous facility, after all. I just hope nobody suggests putting any of these new ideas up to a vote.

If it wasn’t for disinterest, I wouldn’t have no interest at all.

Kommentare auf Deutsch? Logisch.

Posted by clarsonimus at 16:55:21 | Permanent Link | Comments (7) |
Comments
1 - Would the lack of compusion regarding outcome, considering our earlier discussion of referendum by advisory or lawful approval, have anything to do with the low turnout.? If as you suggested this was advisory and the Berlin authorities were h*** bent on razing the airport then the citizens could very well have decided why bother? BTW, what were the final results as The Guardian link, at least that I could find, didn't bother to mention. (Comment this)

Written by: Pat Patterson at 2008/04/28 - 17:05:54
2 - Was going to say the same thing. Why bother voting in favour of keeping it if the authorities are going to ignore the result anyway? (Comment this)

Written by: ian in hamburg at 2008/04/28 - 17:38:06
3 - ian and Pat, yeah, I'm sure that had a lot to do with it. But only a 21 percent turnout? I'm a bit shocked, I must say. Das sind ja fast Amerikanische Verhältnisse! As for the final results, of those who voted, 60,2 percent wanted to keep the airport running ---http://www.berlinonline.de/aktuelles/berlin/detail_ddp_2093860630.php (Comment this)

Written by: clarsonimus at 2008/04/28 - 17:53:38
4 - Well, we recently had a Vector Control election in my city and the turnout was 16% but I think might have been lower as the dead were seen shuffling towards the polling station. Vector control is for finding the source of mosquito outbreaks which, unfortunately, because of the steady rain and now 90+ temperatures we are noticing quite a lot of the little goumands. (Comment this)

Written by: Pat Patterson at 2008/04/29 - 03:27:15
5 - Pat, and in all fairness, a full 500,000 Berliners voted, that's a higher turnout than during the last local election, I'm told. But alas, it was too little too late. (Comment this)

Written by: clarsonimus at 2008/04/29 - 17:05:45 in reply to: 4
6 - Yeah but at least we are still going to do something about the mosquitos! And Tempelhof...still twitching? (Comment this)

Written by: Pat Patterson at 2008/04/30 - 00:21:04
7 - Pat, nope. That issue is now dead as a door nail. Nobody even moaned properly about the results, or lack of them. What has become of this nation!? (Comment this)

Written by: clarsonimus at 2008/04/30 - 17:12:41
Write a comment