Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Is Germany running out of wind?

It’s bad enough for a straight-A wind energy Musterschuler (model student) like Germany to suddenly fall back to fifth place in class (at least when it comes to the number of turbines installed last year, that is), but to be passed up in the process by the Mother of all Umweltsünder (environmental sinners), the United States of America herself, well, that’s about enough to knock the wind out of you, as in them, which is of course what it did.



It seems that new turbine installations in Germany have dropped a full 25 percent in the past few months, primarily due to subsidies that the government doesn’t want to pay anymore. So you see, for all of the loud talk about new breakthrough technology and wave of the future and the next big export industry thing and saving the planet, blah, blah, money, it seems, makes the turbine go round after all. If these windmills don’t get subsidized here, they don’t get built. At least not for now, they don’t.

But I have confidence that Germany’s wind ideologues will be back up on their feet to be blown off them again in no time. After all, when it comes to energy policy, there is only one thing Germany has more of than wind, and that’s hot air.

“Wer Wind sät, wird Flaute ernten.”

Kommentare auf Deutsch? Klar.

PS: Thanks for the global change link, EuroYank.

Posted by clarsonimus at 17:13:01 | Permanent Link | Comments (23) |
Comments
1 2
1 - Wind power in the US produces less than 1% of the power provided by fossil fuels yet wind gets almost 1/10th the amount that fossil fuels get in a variety of subsidies, tax rebates, R&D, writeoffs and any other multitude of boondoggles (that I am unfortunately not invested in now). And some of the states that invest heavily in wind farms, Texas being the largest, are now discovering that these farms are deactivating the turbines because the unreliability and expense tthat they tried to pass ono to the local grid has made some of the local utilities cry uncle and switch back to natural gas and coal.

Wind farms in the US, and I think I can safely assume, the rest of the world, is more a matter of building them rather they will actually live up to the hype.

 (Comment this)

Written by: Pat Patterson at 2008/04/23 - 01:32:19
2 - Clarsonimus - As usual you ignore fact and bring in fantasy ... To a large extent, however, the growth of renewable energy technology export markets depends on factors that are beyond the control of German policymakers or industry. For example, the EU’s ratification of the Kyoto Protocol provided significant export opportunities to Germany’s renewable technology producers, who were well-positioned to capture a large portion of the European market as soon as Kyoto was adopted. However, the domestic policy environments of target countries beyond the EU are likely to be the major determinants of longer-term export potential

And here is the link ... http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/energytrends/germany/6/
(Renewable Energy Policy in Germany: An Overview and Assessment.)

Your devoted student and understudy (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/23 - 03:07:08
3 - "For example, the EU’s ratification of the Kyoto Protocol provided significant export opportunities to Germany’s renewable technology producers."

If I understand EuiroYank, Germany is allowing its domestic wind farms to go to pot because there is a lot of money to be made elsewhere in the EU.

When I lived in Germany 30 years ago, Germans had to get on a 2 year waiting list for a Mercedes Benz. This was because 80% of the production was being shipped overseas, primarily to the U.S,A.

Exports ueber alles?
 (Comment this)

Written by: Meckler at 2008/04/23 - 15:30:18
4 - Meckler who cares what you think! Just because your dollar has gone to pot, and your banks crashed, and your housing market went to the dogs, and your Federal Reserve has to keep bailing out and giving welfare to your greatest corporations, and the rest of the world that invested in your phoney baloney subprime mortgage market and lost 1.2 trillion dollars, who gives an F what you think happened 30 years ago. Did you get a big hit of Agent Orange or is Vietnam Syndrome still got you down bubba? USA unter alles! (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/23 - 18:17:06
5 - Agent Orange in 1978? I did like "Living In Darkness." (Comment this)

Written by: Pat Patterson at 2008/04/23 - 21:02:56
6 - Pat Patterson, a typical stupid remark of yours - it took almost 25 years to get limited recognition of Agent Orange Syndrome for Vietnam Vets when 1% of those exposed were recognized disabled, the majority to this day have not had their Agent Orange cancers recognized -
some 35,000 Viet Nam veterans have vigorously pressed Washington to compensate them for injuries and illnesses that they believe were caused by exposure to Agent Orange. The herbicide contains dioxin, a potent poison that causes cancer in laboratory animals. But Government officials have delayed paying most claims, pointing to a lack of scientific proof that Agent Orange hurt the soldiers ... and here is the link http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,969769,00.html (by the way Pat Patterson you are a stupid IDIOT) (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/23 - 22:14:09
7 - Euro Yank:

You sound like a Gazprom employee!

Don't worry about the U.S. economy. I went shopping with my fiancee at Victoria Secret last weekend. First, the mall was packed. Second, Victoria Secret had a line at the cash register that went outside the door as fashionable women paid $50 each for a Busenhalter.

Remember, While greedy French and German banks bought surities that were based on sub-prime mortgage loans, poor, undereducated Americans were being terribly exploited with high interst rates. Nieder mit den Eurogeiere! (Comment this)

Written by: Meckler at 2008/04/24 - 20:10:11
8 - Eurogeiere, you may be expert in sniffing out women's undergarment, but in economics du bist kein Berliner, and you are not even a good bring back the Deutschmark advocate bubi! (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/24 - 23:20:46
9 - Why bother to link to a 18 year old article that is entitled "Clear Bill for Agent Orange'" which basically argues that there was not connection found between the symptoms and exposure to Agent Orange. In fact the only group that did have a higher rate than usual of non-Hodgkins lymphoma, which huge doses of dioxin caused in rats in experiments, were sailors that never handled the herbicide. A later study put out by the USAF in 2000 found that studies of load handlers from the Viet Nam showed that they had 21% less of the cancers claimed exposure to Agent Orange or even large doses of dioxin caused. But not reading a link is the surest way to reveal a lack of seriousness and smugness that EuroYank has proven to have in abdundance. (Comment this)

Written by: Pat Patterson at 2008/04/25 - 01:22:34
10 - Pat Patterson, you actually did click the link, but here is the current wikipedia and you thought you had something serious bubba ... wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/25 - 15:02:55
11 - Pat Patterson, you fell for the oldest trick in the book, and you actually out- dumbed yourself and proven to everybody here how smart (smartass) you are ... EVERYBODY - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange (everybody now compare the official wikipedia findings with Pat Pattersons comment, and see how stupid this jerk (or is it JERKOFF) is!
one more time - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Orange (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/25 - 15:17:51
12 - "...official Wikipedia" findings simply means that EuroYank has just stumbled on to the site or simply doesn't understand what the masthead means, "Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." Anyone, even someone like the anti-Semitic EuroYank.

The Wikipedia entry clearly does not cite one study that showed any link between Agent Orange and the symptoms that have been claimed but does give a pretty accurate account of the political and legal attempts to prove and acknowledge damages. But, I repeat, there is not one line in the entry that shows any actual proof or any studies that have found that Agent Orange caused these symptoms.

As to who is the idiot I will leave that judgement to someone who can actually read without moving his lips and then falling down asleep exhausted and confused after a few sentences. (Comment this)

Written by: Pat Patterson at 2008/04/25 - 15:57:26
13 - Pat Patterson you are not in wikepedia therefore you are free to edit yourself, and there is not one study to show that you exist, or have a website where your intellect can be checked out. And Pat Patterson there is no official study to prove that you are not a FIGMENT OF YOUR OWN IMAGINATION! (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/25 - 16:17:40
14 - Pat Patterson, identify yourself EuroYank is well-known on the web ... http://euroyank.blogspot,com ... and you calling me an Anti-Semite ... I would like to have my attorney contact you. Where can you be reached? (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/25 - 16:29:57
15 - http://euroyank.blogspot.com/ (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/25 - 16:31:33
16 - Clarsonimus (Observing Hermann) you are going to receive a subpoena from my attorney to identify Pat Patterson. I suggest you do not delete any of the conversations here because you can also be included in a Defamation of Character lawsuit! (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/25 - 16:38:45
17 - Clarsonimus ... who is Pat Patterson and where is his website? Its one thing to bs but to use EuroYank my brand online) and call me an anti-semite on your blog is another. Will you answer or does the subpoena route have to be taken? (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/25 - 18:37:46
18 - EuroYank, I don't know who Pat Patterson is. I don't know who you are. I don't know who Indeterminacy, letters, Nelly, Cosima, etc. are. I like to speculate about who they are, but I don't know them. I don't know anybody here (with two exceptions). You may have heard the old saying: "In the Internet nobody knows you're a dog." That's the nature of this medium. You don't know who someone is even when they tell you who they are. I DO enjoy hearing from all of you, however. Usually. I don't care for the occasional excitement and aggression, but that's not really any of my business. I could turn off these comments but that wouldn't be any fun. I can and have altered inappropriate comments in the past, but I don't like to. I can't help you here, in other words. It might be a good idea to maybe not take all of this all that seriously, though. It's just a blog. (Comment this)

Written by: clarsonimus at 2008/04/25 - 19:12:05 in reply to: 17
19 - Clarsonimus you have my link and my homepage (http://www.sauerkrautyankee.com/) identified on my blog describes my person.

Normally I would agree, but EuroYank has been online for five years and it is a recognized brand name like your blog is.

I stand behind my blog, and my autobiography is also on EuroYank under (http://www.sauerkrautyankee.com/)

It is one thing to disagree and play games and use satire, BUT I can document that Pat Patterson has been calling me an anti-semite and a NAZI on your blog for a long time.

I want to nail him and sue him. Can you come clean with me regarding his website and any other identity you have of him? Do you have a record of his ISP.

I do not wish to subpoena the ISP records for your blog, but I am serious about this. And once again I ask you kindly. I will use any legal means possible to obtain the ISP records of your blog if necessary. (Comment this)

Written by: EuroYank at 2008/04/25 - 19:29:49
20 - EuroYank, do whatever you think is necessary. But I'm going to move on to new stuff now. (Comment this)

Written by: clarsonimus at 2008/04/25 - 20:27:58
Write a comment






1 2